Author Topic: Moses v. Armstrong foils  (Read 3571 times)

MasFoil

  • Waikiki Status
  • *
  • Posts: 13
    • View Profile
Moses v. Armstrong foils
« on: February 14, 2021, 07:52:02 AM »
Looking for comparative feedback on both brands. Has anyone ridden both?

From marketing it looks like Armstrong might be better build quality. Is this accurate? Does this translate to a heavier kit?

Moses has lots of kite foiling experience and more performance wing choices. Seems like their foils are faster. Has anyone been able to compare both?

Thanks!

Dwight (DW)

  • Cortez Bank Status
  • *****
  • Posts: 4780
    • View Profile
    • supSURFmachines
Re: Moses v. Armstrong foils
« Reply #1 on: February 14, 2021, 08:06:06 AM »
I’ve owned both.

I had the W1100 with 483 and 450 tails. Have ridden the Slingshot clones too.

I had the Armstrong 2400, 1850, 1550, 1250, 1050.

Armstrong is lighter.

Armstrong flows and feels more surfy. Overall, I prefer the “feel” and ride of the Armstrong.

MasFoil

  • Waikiki Status
  • *
  • Posts: 13
    • View Profile
Re: Moses v. Armstrong foils
« Reply #2 on: February 14, 2021, 10:40:11 PM »
Thanks for the feedback, Dwight! That’s exactly what I was looking for.

Thatspec

  • Sunset Status
  • ****
  • Posts: 376
    • View Profile
Re: Moses v. Armstrong foils
« Reply #3 on: February 16, 2021, 09:54:36 AM »


From marketing it looks like Armstrong might be better build quality. Is this accurate?

Thanks!

If you weigh over 70Kg I'd avoid the larger Moses wings. Seeing too many pulled front wing mount inserts from hard use / bad landings. Until they address that skinny contact area with three bolts it's going to stay a kitefoil company.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal