Author Topic: Heavy weight rider SIMSUP review  (Read 19782 times)

beached

  • Rincon Status
  • ***
  • Posts: 245
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Heavy weight rider SIMSUP review
« Reply #15 on: May 02, 2013, 06:40:52 AM »
lopezwill, i wonder if you've tried any other smaller wide boards, like the Starboard Hero for instance. that board is 9'*33" and 150L, and for me, those are the perfect dimensions. curious as to whether you think the overall SIMSUP shape is what matters, or just having that much width for larger guys is more important.  

in general, i wonder if guys over 6 feet tall and over 200 lbs have a sweet spot for width (i.e., 33") when using shorter boards (9' and under). i've tried 8'10" and 31" width, but though it surfs well, it's just too much work in our standard east coast chop.  even at 32" i haven't been comfortable, but once i get on a 33" board, all is well.  

AJR

  • Teahupoo Status
  • ******
  • Posts: 1070
    • View Profile
Re: Heavy weight rider SIMSUP review
« Reply #16 on: May 02, 2013, 08:45:55 AM »
At my current weight of 212, I'm having some concerns about my ability to ride my, very soon to arrive, 7'10" x 30.5", Phoenix V2.  What a great reason to shed 10lbs or so.  I can't wait!

Surf naked at worst case - the wetsuit is good for a few pounds...

AJR

  • Teahupoo Status
  • ******
  • Posts: 1070
    • View Profile
Re: Heavy weight rider SIMSUP review
« Reply #17 on: May 02, 2013, 08:49:30 AM »
lopezwill, i wonder if you've tried any other smaller wide boards, like the Starboard Hero for instance. that board is 9'*33" and 150L, and for me, those are the perfect dimensions. curious as to whether you think the overall SIMSUP shape is what matters, or just having that much width for larger guys is more important.  

in general, i wonder if guys over 6 feet tall and over 200 lbs have a sweet spot for width (i.e., 33") when using shorter boards (9' and under). i've tried 8'10" and 31" width, but though it surfs well, it's just too much work in our standard east coast chop.  even at 32" i haven't been comfortable, but once i get on a 33" board, all is well.  

In my experience it's heavily dependent on shape and not just width.  I'm comfortable on my Craig at 8'10"x29.5; more so than the Coreban Fusion I had in the past because the domed deck on the Coreban was tippier to me.  My friend has two 8'6"x30" boards - a Stamps Grim Ripper & a Craig like mine.  Both have more of a pulled in nose and the Craig has a narrow pin tail whereas the Stamps is a wider fish tail.  I can stand all day on his Craig with no issues but have a heck of time finding the fore/aft balance point on his Stamps.  I think it's the foam displacement?

lopezwill

  • Peahi Status
  • *****
  • Posts: 535
    • View Profile
Re: Heavy weight rider SIMSUP review
« Reply #18 on: May 02, 2013, 07:23:28 PM »
beached

  There are so many variables to shaping a staple high performance sup for heavyweights.  Remember the Hobie Sumo?  Sort of a disk you stand on that is thicker for more stability.  I have never tried one so I won't comment.  I did have the 9'3" C4 Subvector with the the recessed deck for stability.  I don't hear much about "Recessed decks" lately?

 DW once said, (and I've found this to be true for me) "The fuller rails and flat decks are more stable."  The pinched lower volume (surfboard type) rails with the domed decks are more unstable and I've found this to be true also.

  Maybe this is information most of you already know but as a heavyweight wanting "Stability and PERFORMANCE" these are just some things I've discovered from trial and error.


 

leroy13

  • Waikiki Status
  • *
  • Posts: 29
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Heavy weight rider SIMSUP review
« Reply #19 on: May 02, 2013, 10:52:36 PM »

 I'm 57, 6'4" 225 lbs, 4 years experience with sup surfing, plenty years of lay down surfing.  This is a review of the L41, S4, simsup.  The reason I'm starting this new thread is believe heavyweights (210 and up) really need different measurements on these simsups to feel comfortable and have a good time surfing these new shapes.  I'm an average, maybe above average middle aged sup surfer that has spent a lot of money on sup boards in the last four years.

  I first had the 8'5" simsup at 31.5 across, 140 volume.  This board surfed great but was too small and tippie for me making it more frustrating than fun in the light and moderate chop I surf in the most.  My new L41 is 8'10" 33 across, 159 volume.  I'm WAY more comfortable on this board and can just stand in the lineup with very little balance problems.  Even at 33 across this board has its challenges in heavy chop and cross chop seas...but is totally doable!  I wouldn't want the board any shorter, longer or narrower.  This shape seems to be a good fit for my weight and height.  You wont find these dimensions on a "Pop out"...yet.  I believe these designs will become the norm for small to medium surf around the world for heavier riders.  Just my opinion though.

  Not everybody is going to like the way these simsups ride.  Yes, I said it.  These boards have a "Skatie" feel to them.  Much different surfing than the norm of riding sup's like a high performance longboard.  Cross stepping, tail slides, nose riding etc.  The more typical (think of Laird Hamilton ripping longboard) maneuvers.  These simsups like to be ridden over the tail while turning, doing cut backs and floaters.

  I don't like these simsups in large, hollow ropey waves.  I much prefer a narrower ten footer for thumpie sup surfing.  These boards are fin sensitive!  If you don't have the correct fin set up you may hate the board.  Change the fin set up and you will be in love with the same board.  I finally have the fins set where I like them and can really milk the performance out of this board.  I'm still experimenting on fins to be honest.

  The L41, S4 has pinched shortboard surfboard rails.  the "Standard" simsups have a fuller, more boxed rail and I think a heavyweight can go shorter and narrower on that design.

  Finally the review:

  This L41 simsup is super fast!  It has skatie, fast feel to it right out of the gate.  You can make lots of directional changes on the wave without loosing speed.  The board can perform full round house cut backs without loosing speed and you better get ready cause your banking off the soup and bottom turning for round two.  These boards work great in smaller, mushie surf for us heavyweights.  We finally have a board that surfs like a "High performance shortboard" in small surf...If the dimensions and fin set ups are correct for your weight.  My 9'6" high performance sup is collecting a lot of dust.  These simsups are just plain fun to surf! 

  I'll end with saying I like all types of sup surfing.  I enjoy longboard type sup surfing too.  I have an 11 footer that I still use because I like the glide.  I'm really enjoying this simsup!  These simsups seem to get the most out of the smaller surf.  As a heavyweight I can get more turns and maneuvers in the smaller surf.  I'm curious how Stoneaxe - Supthecreek - Ponobill simsups ride? 

Hi Mr Lopez.
Excellent review and it sounds like a board that I would be really interested in purchasing.  Is yours a total custom or a custom that still maintains the basic correlation of dimensions? :) How much difference in pricing between a standard and custom if its not rude to ask? ;D I'm trying to work out if I'll have to sell one of my children to afford it!! :o  That is a joke by the way ;)!

linter

  • Teahupoo Status
  • ******
  • Posts: 1768
    • View Profile
Re: Heavy weight rider SIMSUP review
« Reply #20 on: May 03, 2013, 06:46:40 AM »
  Here's a sneak peek at what I'll be getting once it's done.  It's 9-5 x 32.5, vol 160L, an L41.  I only weigh 170 but due to various and sundry I need the stability of someone who weighs, oh, I dunno, 250 or thereabout (ie, SupTheCreek's old weight :D).  Also, I have no interest in short-board-style riding, so what Kirk has come up with for me is a longboard simsup, for longboard-type moves (ie, just standin' there in trim, speeding along, hopefully  :)).  The nose of the board in this pic looks bulbous; I think that's due to the wide-angle lens and that in reality, the widest part is back in the hips.  In any event, I won't be doing no round-house cutbacks on this baby; with that tail and the great-big-honking fin that probably comes with it, it'll be hard enough just swinging it around after the take off.  Whatever.  Seems like it ought to be a great small-wave summertime SUP.  Can't wait for it to get here!

lopezwill

  • Peahi Status
  • *****
  • Posts: 535
    • View Profile
Re: Heavy weight rider SIMSUP review
« Reply #21 on: May 03, 2013, 07:05:22 AM »

Leroy 13

The board is a custom L41 surfboards out of Santa Cruz Calif.  No price difference for the larger simsup.  No need to sell one of your kids...maybe your pet dog or something.  That is a bad joke of mine by the way.

Linter

  Please do a review on that board after you've ridden it awhile.  I've been wondering how a longer board with those rails would work?  I'm really not concerned about going shorter and shorter in sup designs.  I think at the end of the day sup surfers want performance and stability.

Larry Allison

  • Peahi Status
  • *****
  • Posts: 933
    • View Profile
    • https://www.facebook.com/larry.w.allison
    • Email
Re: Heavy weight rider SIMSUP review
« Reply #22 on: May 03, 2013, 09:06:18 AM »

 I'm 57, 6'4" 225 lbs, 4 years experience with sup surfing, plenty years of lay down surfing.  This is a review of the L41, S4, simsup.  The reason I'm starting this new thread is believe heavyweights (210 and up) really need different measurements on these simsups to feel comfortable and have a good time surfing these new shapes.  I'm an average, maybe above average middle aged sup surfer that has spent a lot of money on sup boards in the last four years.

  I first had the 8'5" simsup at 31.5 across, 140 volume.  This board surfed great but was too small and tippie for me making it more frustrating than fun in the light and moderate chop I surf in the most.  My new L41 is 8'10" 33 across, 159 volume.  I'm WAY more comfortable on this board and can just stand in the lineup with very little balance problems.  Even at 33 across this board has its challenges in heavy chop and cross chop seas...but is totally doable!  I wouldn't want the board any shorter, longer or narrower.  This shape seems to be a good fit for my weight and height.  You wont find these dimensions on a "Pop out"...yet.  I believe these designs will become the norm for small to medium surf around the world for heavier riders.  Just my opinion though.

  Not everybody is going to like the way these simsups ride.  Yes, I said it.  These boards have a "Skatie" feel to them.  Much different surfing than the norm of riding sup's like a high performance longboard.  Cross stepping, tail slides, nose riding etc.  The more typical (think of Laird Hamilton ripping longboard) maneuvers.  These simsups like to be ridden over the tail while turning, doing cut backs and floaters.

  I don't like these simsups in large, hollow ropey waves.  I much prefer a narrower ten footer for thumpie sup surfing.  These boards are fin sensitive!  If you don't have the correct fin set up you may hate the board.  Change the fin set up and you will be in love with the same board.  I finally have the fins set where I like them and can really milk the performance out of this board.  I'm still experimenting on fins to be honest.

  The L41, S4 has pinched shortboard surfboard rails.  the "Standard" simsups have a fuller, more boxed rail and I think a heavyweight can go shorter and narrower on that design.

  Finally the review:

  This L41 simsup is super fast!  It has skatie, fast feel to it right out of the gate.  You can make lots of directional changes on the wave without loosing speed.  The board can perform full round house cut backs without loosing speed and you better get ready cause your banking off the soup and bottom turning for round two.  These boards work great in smaller, mushie surf for us heavyweights.  We finally have a board that surfs like a "High performance shortboard" in small surf...If the dimensions and fin set ups are correct for your weight.  My 9'6" high performance sup is collecting a lot of dust.  These simsups are just plain fun to surf! 

  I'll end with saying I like all types of sup surfing.  I enjoy longboard type sup surfing too.  I have an 11 footer that I still use because I like the glide.  I'm really enjoying this simsup!  These simsups seem to get the most out of the smaller surf.  As a heavyweight I can get more turns and maneuvers in the smaller surf.  I'm curious how Stoneaxe - Supthecreek - Ponobill simsups ride? 

Finally someone states the facts, good review lopez! Airplane Flooring (Coremat material) should stay in the plane not under a Sup Surf Board. Not to forget fins being over toed along with inverted flanged boxes in concave bottom boards which causes you to loose 3 to 4 degree cant and your fins become more vertical which will cause your board to be trackey. 99 percent of existing surfboard fins are to small or wrong angled plan shape for Sup Surfing so be  careful when spending your money my friends. Mahalo, Larry
Allison Race Fins

SUPCHLU

  • Rincon Status
  • ***
  • Posts: 180
    • View Profile
Re: Heavy weight rider SIMSUP review
« Reply #23 on: May 03, 2013, 02:17:25 PM »
lopezwill, i wonder if you've tried any other smaller wide boards, like the Starboard Hero for instance. that board is 9'*33" and 150L, and for me, those are the perfect dimensions. curious as to whether you think the overall SIMSUP shape is what matters, or just having that much width for larger guys is more important.
Yes, just the other day, swapped boards with a guy so he could try my 7'8"x30" Retro/Timsup, while I just on his 9'0" Hero....he had fun, I didn't.

After being on the Retro that floats my 6' and 205lbs (lost five recently, yeehaw!) just fine, and is as stable as any of the larger boards I've owned.....paddling around, and surfing the Hero in waist to chest high stuff, felt like I was on an aircraft carrier, and trying to get it to speed and turn reasonably was just not going to happen.

My buddy (210 lbs.) in return, while having a slight bit of problem balancing at first (he got better as time went on), loved the Retro once he got is in some waves, and his exact words were, "Damn this thing is fun, I even think it makes me surf better".....which was hard for me to argue, because that was exactly the same way I felt the first demo ride I had out on it.

After his 45 minutes on it or so (and me having to go get it back from him ;D), the rest of the session he talked  about ordering one, as has everyone else that I've let try it.

Not saying it's the perfect board for all conditions, and why I have an 8'5" on order from another shaper, but in our average, below head-high (more like below chest high), mushy stuff that we get at SanO were I find myself most of the time, I can see this board as being my "go to", and wouldn't be surprised to see a bunch more guys out on something similar in the not too distant future.

BTW, just got done throwing some Monster on the nose, because with its fuller shaped nose, I think it has the added feature of nose-riding it built right in.  Something that on my pulled-in nosed other boards was difficult to pull off.....at least for me that is.  :-\

« Last Edit: May 03, 2013, 02:20:30 PM by SUPCHLU »

Subber

  • Peahi Status
  • *****
  • Posts: 875
    • View Profile
Re: Heavy weight rider SIMSUP review
« Reply #24 on: May 03, 2013, 06:21:58 PM »
 Here's a sneak peek at what I'll be getting once it's done.  It's 9-5 x 32.5, vol 160L, an L41.  I only weigh 170 but due to various and sundry I need the stability of someone who weighs, oh, I dunno, 250 or thereabout (ie, SupTheCreek's old weight :D).  Also, I have no interest in short-board-style riding, so what Kirk has come up with for me is a longboard simsup, for longboard-type moves (ie, just standin' there in trim, speeding along, hopefully  :)).  The nose of the board in this pic looks bulbous; I think that's due to the wide-angle lens and that in reality, the widest part is back in the hips.  In any event, I won't be doing no round-house cutbacks on this baby; with that tail and the great-big-honking fin that probably comes with it, it'll be hard enough just swinging it around after the take off.  Whatever.  Seems like it ought to be a great small-wave summertime SUP.  Can't wait for it to get here!

Nice.....is that a TipSIMSUP or based on it?

That is like what I'd be interested in....I was thinking 9' but 9'5" is even better.......if it is really for small or mushy waves, I want it even bigger and floatier...to make catching those types of waves even easier...
and I like to surf a long board style, including nose riding.

Let us know how you like it.
« Last Edit: May 03, 2013, 06:23:45 PM by Subber »
Jimmy Lewis Black & Blue Noserider 10'1"x31"x4.25," 164 liters, 24 lbs, 1 box
Pearson Laird Surftech Longboard 10'6"x23"x29.75"x18"x4.375," 154 liters, 24 lbs, 3 boxes
Takayama Ali'i II Surftech 11'x21.375”x28.5”x17.25”x 4.25,” 162 liters, 26 lbs, 3 boxes

 


* Recent Posts

post Re: Need a new Impact Vest
[Wingsurfing, Windfoiling, Wingfoiling, Wing SUP]
foiled again
Today at 08:00:16 PM
post Re: Sunova Ghost 8'10 SUP
[Classifieds]
kliss99
Today at 05:01:39 AM
post Re: Need a new Impact Vest
[Wingsurfing, Windfoiling, Wingfoiling, Wing SUP]
PonoBill
April 23, 2024, 07:55:28 PM
post Re: Need a new Impact Vest
[Wingsurfing, Windfoiling, Wingfoiling, Wing SUP]
B-Walnut
April 23, 2024, 07:26:43 PM
post Re: Need a new Impact Vest
[Wingsurfing, Windfoiling, Wingfoiling, Wing SUP]
spindrift
April 23, 2024, 07:16:46 PM
post Re: Need a new Impact Vest
[Wingsurfing, Windfoiling, Wingfoiling, Wing SUP]
B-Walnut
April 23, 2024, 06:56:28 PM
post Need a new Impact Vest
[Wingsurfing, Windfoiling, Wingfoiling, Wing SUP]
spindrift
April 23, 2024, 06:36:51 PM
post Re: Ocean Rodeo Glide-Allula
[Wingsurfing, Windfoiling, Wingfoiling, Wing SUP]
kiteboarder
April 23, 2024, 06:06:50 PM
post Re: Ocean Rodeo Glide-Allula
[Wingsurfing, Windfoiling, Wingfoiling, Wing SUP]
B-Walnut
April 23, 2024, 04:22:52 PM
post Re: Ocean Rodeo Glide-Allula
[Wingsurfing, Windfoiling, Wingfoiling, Wing SUP]
kiteboarder
April 23, 2024, 03:07:49 PM
post Re: Ocean Rodeo Glide-Allula
[Wingsurfing, Windfoiling, Wingfoiling, Wing SUP]
B-Walnut
April 23, 2024, 02:59:32 PM
post Re: Ocean Rodeo Glide-Allula
[Wingsurfing, Windfoiling, Wingfoiling, Wing SUP]
Dwight (DW)
April 23, 2024, 02:41:07 PM
post Re: Erik Antonson interview with Stacy Peralta
[Random]
surfinJ
April 23, 2024, 01:34:42 PM
post Fanatic 8.3 Allwave
[Classifieds]
firesurf
April 23, 2024, 01:28:40 PM
post Re: Ocean Rodeo Glide-Allula
[Wingsurfing, Windfoiling, Wingfoiling, Wing SUP]
B-Walnut
April 23, 2024, 01:24:35 PM
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal